Firm News

As expected, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, the American Bankers Association, the Consumer Bankers Association and three Texas trade groups filed suit against the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“CFPB”) on March 7 to halt implementation of the CFPB’s newly finalized rule on credit card late fees.
Read More

Over a year after the issuance of a notice of proposed rulemaking to amend the Regulation Z safe harbor for credit card late fees, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“CFPB”) announced the final rule to slash the credit card late fee safe harbor from its current rate of $30 for the first violation and $41 thereafter to a flat $8 late fee for card issuers with more than 1 million open accounts.
Read More

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“CFPB”) has issued guidance on kickbacks and steering in the context of (i) digital comparison-shopping tools, whether on websites, in applications or through chatbots, and (ii) lead generation.
Read More

State and federal regulators continue to press on compliance and oversight issues affecting both fintechs and their bank partners. See, e.g., our ALERTS of Sept. 22, Nov. 10 and Dec. 27, 2022, and Apr. 28, June 12 and Aug. 8, 2023.
Read More

Pursuant to authority under the Consumer Financial Protection Act (“CFPA”), the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“CFPB”) published a supervisory designation order establishing supervisory examination over World Acceptance Corporation (“World Acceptance”), a small dollar installment lender. This order comes in the wake of World Acceptance contesting the CFPB’s Notice of Reasonable Cause to supervise in April 2023 and marks the first time the CFPB has established supervisory authority over a nonbank lender following a determination that the risks surrounding the conduct of the consumer finance company are sufficient to justify CFPB supervision.

The CFPA authorizes the CFPB to supervise “covered persons” whose conduct poses risks to consumers with regard to the offering or provision of consumer financial products or services. The CFPA does not specify the character or magnitude of “risks to consumers” that is required to subject a covered person to supervision. Instead, Congress left such determination to the discretion of the CFPB, with the requirement that the CFPB (i) identify concrete risks to consumers, which it has reasonable cause to determine exist, (ii) notify the entity of those risks and (iii) give the entity a reasonable chance to respond.
Read more

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit affirmed the district court holding that the Pennsylvania Consumer Discount Company Act (“CDCA”) was not implicated in the collection of
charged-off debt that related to a loan made by a CDCA licensee.

The debtor alleged violation of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”) after the collector filed a proof of claim in the debtor’s bankruptcy proceeding to collect on the balance of the charged-off loan account. The debtor claimed the filing was unlawful because the debt originated with a CDCA-licensed lender who sold it to an unlicensed third party, allegedly in violation of the CDCA.
Read more

The United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, in a case brought by the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”), entered a Final Judgement against Merchant Cash Advance (“MCA”) operator Jonathan Braun for $3,421,067 for monetary relief to address harm caused to small businesses and $16,956,000 as a civil penalty. The Final Judgement followed a three day jury trial in January of 2024. Read More

On February 9, 2024, the California Court of Appeal reversed a trial court judgment that had stayed enforcement of the most recent California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) regulations. The decision makes the CCPA regulations that had previously been stayed by court order until March 29, 2024 become immediately effective. The regulations implement the California Privacy Rights Act of 2020 (“CPRA”), passed in 2020 and effective January 1, 2023. Read More

On January 17, 2024, the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments in a pair of cases seeking to challenge the Chevron doctrine. The Chevron doctrine refers to the judicial deference given to administrative actions based on the 1984 case of Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 468 U.S. 837 (1984). Under Chevron, the Court set forth a legal test as to when the court should defer to an agency’s interpretation, providing that judicial deference is appropriate where the agency’s interpretation was not unreasonable, so long as Congress had not spoken directly to the precise question. Read More

The Colorado Attorney General entered into an Order and Assurance of Discontinuance with TrueAccord, a licensed debt collector, in regard to the collection of loans made by unlicensed entities associated with Native American tribes with finance charges that exceeded the rate permitted for unlicensed entities under the Colorado Uniform Consumer Credit Code (“UCCC”). Read More